Theunissen, T. W. & Jaenisch, R. Mechanisms of gene regulation in human embryos and pluripotent stem cells. Development 144, 4496–4509 (2017).
Kontur, C., Jeong, M., Cifuentes, D. & Giraldez, A. J. Ythdf m6A readers function redundantly during zebrafish development. Cell Rep. 33, 108598 (2020).
Morgan, M. et al. mRNA 3’ uridylation and poly(A) tail length sculpt the mammalian maternal transcriptome. Nature 548, 347–351 (2017).
Chang, H. et al. Terminal uridylyltransferases execute programmed clearance of maternal transcriptome in vertebrate embryos. Mol Cell 70, 72–82.e7 (2018).
Sha, Q. Q. et al. Dynamics and clinical relevance of maternal mRNA clearance during the oocyte-to-embryo transition in humans. Nat. Commun. 11, 4917 (2020).
Brachova, P., Alvarez, N. S. & Christenson, L. K. Loss of Cnot6l impairs inosine RNA modifications in mouse oocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1191 (2021).
Eisenberg, E. & Levanon, E. Y. A-to-I RNA editing – immune protector and transcriptome diversifier. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 473–490 (2018).
Hoopengardner, B., Bhalla, T., Staber, C. & Reenan, R. Nervous system targets of RNA editing identified by comparative genomics. Science 301, 832–836 (2003).
Lev-Maor, G. et al. RNA-editing-mediated exon evolution. Genome Biol. 8, R29 (2007).
Kawahara, Y. et al. Redirection of silencing targets by adenosine-to-inosine editing of miRNAs. Science 315, 1137–1140 (2007).
Pinto, Y., Buchumenski, I., Levanon, E. Y. & Eisenberg, E. Human cancer tissues exhibit reduced A-to-I editing of miRNAs coupled with elevated editing of their targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 71–82 (2018).
Liddicoat, B. J. et al. RNA editing by ADAR1 prevents MDA5 sensing of endogenous dsRNA as nonself. Science 349, 1115–1120 (2015).
Costa Cruz, P. H. & Kawahara, Y. RNA editing in neurological and neurodegenerative disorders. Methods Mol. Biol. 2181, 309–330 (2021).
Li, J. B. et al. Genome-wide identification of human RNA editing sites by parallel DNA capturing and sequencing. Science 324, 1210–1213 (2009).
Paz-Yaacov, N. et al. Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing shapes transcriptome diversity in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 12174–12179 (2010).
Bahn, J. H. et al. Accurate identification of A-to-I RNA editing in human by transcriptome sequencing. Genome Res. 22, 142–150 (2012).
Ramaswami, G. et al. Accurate identification of human Alu and non-Alu RNA editing sites. Nat. Methods 9, 579–581 (2012).
Ramaswami, G. et al. Identifying RNA editing sites using RNA sequencing data alone. Nat. Methods 10, 128–132 (2013).
Peng, Z. et al. Comprehensive analysis of RNA-Seq data reveals extensive RNA editing in a human transcriptome. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 253–260 (2012).
Daniel, C., Silberberg, G., Behm, M. & Öhman, M. Alu elements shape the primate transcriptome by cis-regulation of RNA editing. Genome Biol. 15, R28 (2014).
Tan, M. H. et al. Dynamic landscape and regulation of RNA editing in mammals. Nature 550, 249–254 (2017).
Mansi, L. et al. REDIportal: millions of novel A-to-I RNA editing events from thousands of RNAseq experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D1012–D1019 (2021).
Qiu, S. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals dynamic changes in A-to-I RNA editome during early human embryogenesis. BMC Genomics 17, 766 (2016).
Li, T. et al. Pig-specific RNA editing during early embryo development revealed by genome-wide comparisons. FEBS Open Bio. 10, 1389–1402 (2020).
Qiu, J., Ma, X., Zeng, F. & Yan, J. RNA editing regulates lncRNA splicing in human early embryo development. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1009630 (2021).
Batzer, M. A. & Deininger, P. L. Alu repeats and human genomic diversity. Nat Rev. Genet. 3, 370–379 (2002).
Daniel, C., Behm, M. & Öhman, M. The role of Alu elements in the cis-regulation of RNA processing. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 72, 4063–4076 (2015).
Schaffer, A. A. & Levanon, E. Y. ALU A-to-I RNA editing: millions of sites and many open questions. Methods Mol. Biol. 2181, 149–162 (2021).
Buchumenski, I. et al. Systematic identification of A-to-I RNA editing in zebrafish development and adult organs. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 4325–4337 (2021).
Barrett, T. et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets–update. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D991–D995 (2013).
NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP). Exome variant server. http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/ [Nov, 2020 accessed] (2020).
Phan, L. et al. ALFA: allele frequency aggregator. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/docs/gsr/alfa/ (2020).
Consortium, G. P. et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020).
Ding, J., Lin, C. & Bar-Joseph, Z. Cell lineage inference from SNP and scRNA-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e56 (2019).
Roth, S. H., Levanon, E. Y. & Eisenberg, E. Genome-wide quantification of ADAR adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing activity. Nat. Methods 16, 1131–1138 (2019).
Levanon, E. Y. et al. Evolutionarily conserved human targets of adenosine to inosine RNA editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 1162–1168 (2005).
Leng, L. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis of uniparental embryos reveals parent-of-origin effects on human preimplantation development. Cell Stem Cell 25, 697–712.e6 (2019).
Reyes, J. M. et al. Differing molecular response of young and advanced maternal age human oocytes to IVM. Hum. Reprod. 32, 2199–2208 (2017).
Okada, Y., Yamagata, K., Hong, K., Wakayama, T. & Zhang, Y. A role for the elongator complex in zygotic paternal genome demethylation. Nature 463, 554–558 (2010).
Ding, Y. Supplementary IGV data for human embryonic RNA editome. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7379397 (2022).
Marco, A. Clearance of maternal RNAs: not a mummy’s embryo anymore. Methods Mol. Biol. 1605, 1–10 (2017).
Gonzalez, C., Lopez-Rodriguez, A., Srikumar, D., Rosenthal, J. J. & Holmgren, M. Editing of human K(V)1.1 channel mRNAs disrupts binding of the N-terminus tip at the intracellular cavity. Nat. Commun. 2, 436 (2011).
Hu, X. et al. RNA over-editing of BLCAP contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis identified by whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing. Cancer Lett. 357, 510–519 (2015).
Chen, L. et al. Recoding RNA editing of AZIN1 predisposes to hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Med. 19, 209–216 (2013).
Jiang, Q. et al. ADAR1 promotes malignant progenitor reprogramming in chronic myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 1041–1046 (2013).
Zhou, S. et al. Double-stranded RNA deaminase ADAR1 promotes the Zika virus replication by inhibiting the activation of protein kinase PKR. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 18168–18180 (2019).
Stellos, K. et al. Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing controls cathepsin S expression in atherosclerosis by enabling HuR-mediated post-transcriptional regulation. Nat. Med. 22, 1140–1150 (2016).
Lazzari, E. et al. Alu-dependent RNA editing of GLI1 promotes malignant regeneration in multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 8, 1922 (2017).
Zhao, B. S. et al. m6A-dependent maternal mRNA clearance facilitates zebrafish maternal-to-zygotic transition. Nature 542, 475–478 (2017).
Yu, C. et al. BTG4 is a meiotic cell cycle-coupled maternal-zygotic-transition licensing factor in oocytes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 387–394 (2016).
Ivanova, I. et al. The RNA m6A reader YTHDF2 is essential for the post-transcriptional regulation of the maternal transcriptome and oocyte competence. Mol. Cell 67, 1059–1067.e4 (2017).
Wahle, E. & Winkler, G. S. RNA decay machines: deadenylation by the Ccr4-not and Pan2-Pan3 complexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1829, 561–570 (2013).
Braun, J. E., Huntzinger, E., Fauser, M. & Izaurralde, E. GW182 proteins directly recruit cytoplasmic deadenylase complexes to miRNA targets. Mol. Cell 44, 120–133 (2011).
Fabian, M. R. et al. miRNA-mediated deadenylation is orchestrated by GW182 through two conserved motifs that interact with CCR4-NOT. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1211–1217 (2011).
Chekulaeva, M. et al. miRNA repression involves GW182-mediated recruitment of CCR4-NOT through conserved W-containing motifs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1218–1226 (2011).
Ma, J., Fukuda, Y. & Schultz, R. M. Mobilization of dormant Cnot7 mRNA promotes deadenylation of maternal transcripts during mouse oocyte maturation. Biol. Reprod. 93, 48 (2015).
Hagkarim, N. C. & Grand, R. J. The regulatory properties of the Ccr4-not complex. Cells 9, 2379 (2020).
Fasken, M. B. et al. The RNA exosome and human disease. Methods Mol. Biol. 2062, 3–33 (2020).
Evers, R. & Grummt, I. Molecular coevolution of mammalian ribosomal gene terminator sequences and the transcription termination factor TTF-I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 5827–5831 (1995).
Kim, D. D. et al. Widespread RNA editing of embedded alu elements in the human transcriptome. Genome Res. 14, 1719–1725 (2004).
Zhu, Y., Davis, S., Stephens, R., Meltzer, P. S. & Chen, Y. GEOmetadb: powerful alternative search engine for the Gene Expression Omnibus. Bioinformatics 24, 2798–2800 (2008).
Lo Giudice, C., Tangaro, M. A., Pesole, G. & Picardi, E. Investigating RNA editing in deep transcriptome datasets with REDItools and REDIportal. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1098–1131 (2020).
Frankish, A. et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D766–D773 (2019).
DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).
Sherry, S. T. et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 308–311 (2001).
Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).
Zachariadis, V., Cheng, H., Andrews, N. & Enge, M. A highly scalable method for joint whole-genome sequencing and gene-expression profiling of single cells. Mol. Cell 80, 541–553.e5 (2020).
Macaulay, I. C. et al. G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 12, 519–522 (2015).
Vacic, V., Iakoucheva, L. M. & Radivojac, P. Two sample logo: a graphical representation of the differences between two sets of sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 22, 1536–1537 (2006).
Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012).
Carlson, M. org.Hs.eg.db: Genome wide annotation for human (2019).
Lewis, B. P., Burge, C. B. & Bartel, D. P. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120, 15–20 (2005).
Enright, A. J. et al. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 5, R1 (2003).
Afgan, E. et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W537–W544 (2018).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 290–295 (2015).
Yan, L. et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1131–1139 (2013).
Xue, Z. et al. Genetic programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature 500, 593–597 (2013).
Guo, H. et al. The DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos. Nature 511, 606–610 (2014).
Yanez, L. Z., Han, J., Behr, B. B., Pera, R. A. R. & Camarillo, D. B. Human oocyte developmental potential is predicted by mechanical properties within hours after fertilization. Nat. Commun. 7, 10809 (2016).
Dang, Y. et al. Tracing the expression of circular RNAs in human pre-implantation embryos. Genome Biol. 17, 130 (2016).
Hendrickson, P. G. et al. Conserved roles of mouse DUX and human DUX4 in activating cleavage-stage genes and MERVL/HERVL retrotransposons. Nat. Genet. 49, 925–934 (2017).
Fogarty, N. M. E. et al. Genome editing reveals a role for OCT4 in human embryogenesis. Nature 550, 67–73 (2017).
Wu, J. et al. Chromatin analysis in human early development reveals epigenetic transition during ZGA. Nature 557, 256–260 (2018).
Lv, B. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals regulatory mechanism for trophoblast cell-fate divergence in human peri-implantation conceptuses. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000187 (2019).
Wamaitha, S. E. et al. IGF1-mediated human embryonic stem cell self-renewal recapitulates the embryonic niche. Nat. Commun. 11, 764 (2020).
West, R. C. et al. Dynamics of trophoblast differentiation in peri-implantation-stage human embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 22635–22644 (2019).
Xiang, L. et al. A developmental landscape of 3D-cultured human pre-gastrulation embryos. Nature 577, 537–542 (2020).
Cacchiarelli, D. et al. Integrative analyses of human reprogramming reveal dynamic nature of induced pluripotency. Cell 162, 412–424 (2015).
Szabo, L. et al. Statistically based splicing detection reveals neural enrichment and tissue-specific induction of circular RNA during human fetal development. Genome Biol. 16, 126 (2015).
Choi, J. et al. A comparison of genetically matched cell lines reveals the equivalence of human iPSCs and ESCs. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1173–1181 (2015).
Lau, K. X. et al. Unique properties of a subset of human pluripotent stem cells with high capacity for self-renewal. Nat. Commun. 11, 2420 (2020).
Ding, Y. Human embryonic rna editome. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6658521 (2022).
Ding, Y. Code for human embryonic rna editome. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7386496 (2022).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).